Massachusetts IEP Evaluation Timeline, Dispute Routes and Parent Resources (2026)

Every Massachusetts figure, agency and citation on this page is read against a primary source and dated. Last reviewed . Read against IDEA, 34 CFR Part 300 and Massachusetts's own special education rules. Jump to sources
Evaluation window
30 school days
The clock starts at
Parental consent
State complaint deadline
One year
Due process deadline
Two years

How long does a school in Massachusetts have to complete an IEP evaluation?

Massachusetts counts this deadline in school working days rather than calendar days. Once a district receives written parental consent, the evaluation assessments are completed within 30 school working days. Within 45 school working days of that same consent the district convenes the Team meeting, decides eligibility and gives the parents two copies of the proposed IEP plus the proposed placement, or a written explanation where the Team finds the student is not eligible. A school working day means any day, including a partial day, that students are in attendance for instructional purposes, so summer, school vacations and snow days fall outside the count. A family that disagrees with what the Team decides has three routes: a state complaint to the education department's Problem Resolution System Office within one year of the events, free mediation through the Bureau of Special Education Appeals or a due process hearing at that same bureau, which sits inside the Division of Administrative Law Appeals rather than inside the education department. The state rewrote 603 CMR 28.00 on June 23 2026 to add English learner requirements to the evaluation and IEP process plus a new discipline section. Those amendments left the 30 and 45 school working day windows unchanged.

How to use this page. This is general information about the Massachusetts rules, written for parents. It is not legal or educational advice. Deadlines, agency names and rule numbers change, so confirm anything you plan to rely on with Massachusetts Department of Elementary and Secondary Education, Office of Special Education Planning and Policy or with your district.
A flat illustration of an open tabbed binder with one gold tab and a small clock resting beside it

The evaluation timeline in Massachusetts

The Massachusetts initial evaluation window: 30 school days A horizontal bar showing the Massachusetts initial evaluation window: 30 school days, measured from parental consent, ending at evaluation complete. A lighter bar beneath it carries the federal default of 60 calendar days from parental consent. The two count in different units, so the lengths are not compared. 30 school days The clock starts at Parental consent The window runs to Evaluation complete Against the federal rule Federal default: 60 calendar days Massachusetts counts in school days and the federal rule counts in calendar days, so the two barlengths are shown at equal width rather than compared.
The clock starts at Parental consent 30 school days The window runs to Evaluation complete Against the federal rule Federal default: 60 calendar days Massachusetts counts in school days and thefederal rule counts in calendar days, so the twobar lengths are shown at equal width rather thancompared.
The Massachusetts evaluation clock at a glance. Massachusetts allows 30 school days for an initial evaluation, measured from parental consent to evaluate. The lighter bar is the federal default at 34 CFR 300.301(c)(1).
Initial evaluation window30 school days for the evaluation, 45 school days to the eligibility Team meeting
The clock starts atparental consent to evaluate
Against the federal ruleA timeframe Massachusetts sets for itself

IDEA sets a default of 60 calendar days from parental consent for an initial evaluation (34 CFR 300.301(c)(1)). It also lets a state set its own timeframe instead, which is what Massachusetts has done, so the window above is the one that applies here.

Massachusetts sets one of the shortest windows in the country: the evaluation itself is due within 30 school days of consent. The Team meeting that decides eligibility, placement and the IEP must happen within 45 school days of consent.

Source: 603 CMR 28.04; M.G.L. c. 71B, Section 3 www.doe.mass.edu/lawsregs/603cmr28.html?section=04

The same window sits beside all fifty-one jurisdictions on the evaluation timelines by state table, which explains where the federal deadline comes from. To pull one state's window on its own, the evaluation deadline checker returns that single result.

Reevaluation and IEP review cadence in Massachusetts

Massachusetts puts the annual review and the three year reevaluation in one rule. The district reviews each eligible student's IEP and progress at least annually. Every three years, or sooner if necessary, the district conducts a full three year reevaluation with parental consent. The state's own clocks cover reevaluations rather than initial evaluations alone: the 30 school working day assessment window and the 45 school working day window for the Team meeting plus the proposed IEP both run from written parental consent to an initial evaluation or a reevaluation. Federal rules set the outer frame at a reevaluation at least once every three years unless the parent and the district agree one is unnecessary. A reevaluation happens no more often than once a year unless they agree otherwise. The IEP review happens at least annually.

Source: 603 CMR 28.04(3) and 603 CMR 28.05(1); federal baseline at 34 CFR 300.303(b)(1) and (b)(2) plus 34 CFR 300.324(b)(1) www.doe.mass.edu/lawsregs/603cmr28.html?section=04

If you disagree in Massachusetts

IDEA gives families in every state the same three routes when a disagreement with the school does not resolve at the team table. What changes at the state line is who administers each route, how long you have to file and the local detail below.

The three dispute routes in Massachusetts A flow diagram of the three dispute routes open to a family in Massachusetts when a disagreement with the school does not settle at the team table: state complaint (who handles it problem resolution system office; time limit to file one year), mediation (how it starts voluntary for both sides) and due process hearing (time limit to file two years). A disagreement the team table did not settle State complaint Who handles it Problem Resolution SystemOffice Time limit to file One year Mediation How it starts Voluntary for both sides Due process hearing Time limit to file Two years
A disagreement the team table did notsettle State complaint Who handles it Problem Resolution System Office Time limit to file One year Mediation How it starts Voluntary for both sides Due process hearing Time limit to file Two years
Three routes, one disagreement. Who runs each route in Massachusetts and how long a family has to file, where the Massachusetts rules set a limit. Each one is written out below with its citation.

The state complaint

Handled by Problem Resolution System Office, Massachusetts Department of Elementary and Secondary Education. Time limit to file: One year from the date of the alleged violation.

A state complaint goes to the Problem Resolution System Office, which sits inside the education department in Everett. Any individual or organization may file one, including someone from another state. The person filing signs it then sends a copy to the school district at the same time. The office takes complaints through an online intake form, by email, by fax, by post or in person, with a model intake form translated into nine languages plus other languages on request. The complaint alleges a violation that happened no more than one year before the office received it. The office gives the complainant a chance to add information, gives the district a chance to respond, can carry out an independent on-site investigation where it decides one is needed, then issues a written decision with findings of fact and conclusions within 60 calendar days. That 60 day figure stretches only for exceptional circumstances or where both sides agree to extend it to try mediation. Corrective action can reach compensatory services or monetary reimbursement. The same office handles general education complaints as well, so it is not a special education only route. Its findings are not reviewable by the Bureau of Special Education Appeals.

Source: 603 CMR 28.08(2) for the Problem Resolution System itself, its general education reach and its findings not being reviewable by the Bureau of Special Education Appeals; DESE Special Education Complaint Procedures Guide plus Parent's Notice of Procedural Safeguards section 6.2 (English edition updated May 2025) for the filing channels, the translated model form, the 60 calendar day written decision, the two extension grounds, the on-site investigation power and the corrective action range; 34 CFR 300.152(a) and (b)(1); 34 CFR 300.153(b), (c) and (d) www.doe.mass.edu/prs/guide/

Mediation

Mediation runs through the Bureau of Special Education Appeals in Malden, which employs its own mediators rather than contracting the work out. It costs the family nothing. Both sides have to agree to take part, so no one can be required into it. After a request the mediator schedules a session with the family and the district within 30 days, at a time and place that suits the parties. Discussions stay confidential and cannot be used later at a hearing or in court. An agreement is put in writing, signed by both sides and enforceable in court. Mediation can run alongside a complaint at the Problem Resolution System Office. It is available before a hearing request or after one. The same bureau also mediates early intervention disputes for children under three.

Source: 603 CMR 28.08(4), (4)(a) and (4)(b); M.G.L. c. 71B, Section 2A(a) and (c); Parent's Notice of Procedural Safeguards, section 6.3, English edition updated May 2025, for the confidentiality reaching court proceedings and for the signed agreement being enforceable in court www.mass.gov/mediation-at-the-bsea

A due process hearing

Time limit to file: Two years from the date the parent or the district knew or should have known about the action the complaint is about, with exceptions where the district misrepresented that it had resolved the problem or withheld information it was required to give the parent.

Hearings sit outside the education department. State law places the Bureau of Special Education Appeals in the Division of Administrative Law Appeals as a separate subdivision that is independent of the Department of Elementary and Secondary Education, while the department keeps the general supervision role federal law assigns it. Hearing officers are attorneys hired by the bureau's director under the chief administrative magistrate. The party asking for a hearing sends the request to the other side then sends a copy to the bureau, which names the assigned hearing officer within five days. Where a parent rejects a proposed IEP, a proposed placement or a finding of no eligibility, the district sends that rejection to the bureau within five days, so the bureau learns of the disagreement without the family filing anything. Massachusetts stops at one administrative level. The hearing officer's decision is implemented immediately, neither the bureau nor the department reconsiders it, so an appeal goes to a court of competent jurisdiction. Once a hearing request is on file the parties can also ask for a settlement conference. It is an informal route that runs only where all parties agree to it plus the assigned hearing officer endorses it. It aims to produce a signed settlement in the same sitting. The bureau dropped its earlier condition that both sides have legal representation in May 2025 although one of its own how-to pages still lists that condition.

Source: 603 CMR 28.08(3)(b), (5) and (6); M.G.L. c. 71B, Section 2A(a) and (c); Hearing Rules for Special Education Appeals, Rule I(B) and Rule I(C), revised July 2024, where Rule I(C) states both the two year limit and its two exceptions; Parent's Notice of Procedural Safeguards, section 6.4, English edition updated May 2025; BSEA Reference Manual, revised July 2024, plus the bureau's May 2025 update for the settlement conference; federal frame at 34 CFR 300.507(a)(2) and 34 CFR 300.511(e) and (f) www.mass.gov/doc/hearing-rules-revised-july-2024/download

A preview of the free Evaluation-Request Letter Template, one printable page

Get the free Evaluation-Request Letter Template (PDF)

A ready-to-adapt letter to request an evaluation in writing, with the dates that matter and the language to use.

Instant download, plus a note if the guidance on this topic changes. Unsubscribe anytime.

Who to contact in Massachusetts

A flat illustration of an open document folder with three tabbed sheets, the middle tab gold

Child Find in Massachusetts

Massachusetts starts looking earlier than the age three handoff in two ways. Districts screen three and four year olds plus every child of kindergarten entry age to review development and spot children who should be referred for an evaluation, with participation by three and four year olds left to the parents. A child of two and a half who may be receiving early intervention services is evaluated on referral, so the evaluation happens in time for services to begin at age three where the child is found eligible. A separate rule covers reading: schools assess literacy skills at least twice a year from kindergarten through at least third grade. Where a screening puts a child significantly below the benchmark, the school tells the parent within 30 school days what the result was and how it is responding, then offers a follow up conversation.

Source: 603 CMR 28.03(1)(d) and 28.03(1)(f); 603 CMR 28.04(1)(d) www.doe.mass.edu/lawsregs/603cmr28.html?section=03

The IEP and 504 Command Center shown as a cover and a member area with its five parts: the Command Binder System, the Letter Library, the Meeting Script Deck, the Score-Your-IEP Self-Review and the Plain-Language Rights Cheat Sheet

From the team behind this library

The IEP & 504 Command Center

This page shows you the deadlines and the contacts for your state. The Command Center hands you the done pieces: the binder built, the letters written, the meeting scripts ready and a self-review that shows where your child's IEP is strong or thin before you walk in. The library stays free.

See the Command Center One-time $27. Yours to keep. 60-day money-back guarantee.

Questions parents ask

What is a school working day in Massachusetts and how does it change the 30 and 45 day deadlines?

The regulation counts these windows in school working days. Its definitions section defines a school day as any day, including a partial day, that students are in attendance at school for instructional purposes. The department applied that same definition to the phrase school working day in its June 2025 policy memo. Summer, February and April vacation weeks, holidays and snow days do not count toward the 30 school working days for the assessments or the 45 school working days for the Team meeting plus the proposed IEP. Forty five school working days works out to about nine weeks with school in session, which lands further out on the calendar wherever a vacation week or a run of snow days falls inside the count. The regulation carries its own end of year rule: where consent arrives within 30 to 45 school working days before the school year ends, the district schedules the Team meeting so the proposed IEP or the written finding of no eligibility reaches the parent no later than 14 days after the end of that school year. The department also told districts in June 2025 that the proposed IEP goes to the parent within the 45 school working days and no later than 5 school days after the Team meeting.

What happens after I receive the proposed IEP in Massachusetts?

The district gives the parent two copies of the proposed IEP and the proposed placement. The parent then has 30 days to accept or reject the IEP in whole or in part, to ask for a meeting about the rejected parts or the overall adequacy of the IEP, or to accept an amended proposal where both sides agree on one. Accepting part of an IEP does not hold up the rest: the district implements every accepted element without delay. A rejection of an IEP, a placement or a finding of no eligibility also travels on its own. Within five days the district sends a copy to the Bureau of Special Education Appeals, which then writes to both sides about the right to ask for mediation or a hearing. Where the evaluation information turns out to be too thin to build an IEP, the Team can agree with the parent to an extended evaluation period, which runs no longer than eight school weeks and cannot be used to buy time for assessments that were already required or to hold back services the Team has identified.

Who decides a special education hearing in Massachusetts?

A hearing officer at the Bureau of Special Education Appeals, which state law keeps as a separate subdivision of the Division of Administrative Law Appeals, independent of the Department of Elementary and Secondary Education. Hearing officers are attorneys hired by the bureau's director under the chief administrative magistrate. They must have no personal or professional interest that would conflict with their objectivity. A parent or a district files within two years of when they knew or should have known about the events behind the complaint. That limit is set aside where the district misrepresented that it had resolved the problem or held back information it had to give the parent. The request goes to the other side with a copy to the bureau, which names the assigned hearing officer within five days. The decision is implemented immediately. Massachusetts has no second administrative tier, so neither the bureau nor the department reconsiders a decision and an appeal goes to court.

Can I get an independent evaluation paid for in Massachusetts?

Two routes exist side by side. Under the federal route a parent who disagrees with the district's evaluation asks for an independent educational evaluation at public expense. The district either agrees to pay or goes to the Bureau of Special Education Appeals within five school days to show its own evaluation was comprehensive and appropriate. Massachusetts adds a second, entirely voluntary route built on a sliding fee scale. The district pays the full cost for a family at or below 400 percent of the federal poverty guidelines. It also pays the full cost for a student who qualifies for free or reduced cost lunch or who is in state custody with an educational surrogate parent, with no further documentation of family finances required. Between 400 and 500 percent the district pays 75 percent. Between 500 and 600 percent it pays 50 percent. Above 600 percent it has no cost sharing duty. Sharing income information stays voluntary. This state route holds for 16 months from the date of the evaluation the parent disagrees with. It can cover one area or every area the district assessed. The district cannot answer it by asking for a hearing. Once the report arrives, the Team reconvenes within ten school days to consider it.

Sources

What the facts on this page come from

Last reviewed . That is the day this page was last read against the sources above, not the day the site was rebuilt. How this library is verified

This page is general educational information for parents, not legal or educational advice. It does not tell any family what to do. Every example here is a starting point to discuss and adapt with your child's IEP or 504 team, which decides what fits your child from the evaluation. Confirm anything time-sensitive with your school or district. For a genuinely contested situation, a special education advocate or an attorney who works in your state is the right person to ask.